Virtual vs. Inperson Assistants
June 26, 2008 · Print This Article
Thanks for visiting. Please consider joining over 15,000 other readers in subscribing to our RSS feed or following us on Twitter.
It is hard to beat having someone you can send to the store with your grocery list or wait in line for you at city hall. Maybe I just lucked out, but my non-virtual assistant is really cutting down on the amount of running around I have to do.
A personal assistant (for basic tasks as listed) is a great choice for some things – some of us VA`s will do that for local clients! But when you need an expert in some areas, you may want a larger place to search for them than locally!
Who pays for the gas? That is certainly an important question these days. If you pay someone even $20 per hour to run your errands, gas costs could seriously eat up their paycheck.
@Andrew – I have my assistant use my old car, but occasionally she will use her motorcycle. The town is only about 2.5 miles across so gas isn’t too much. I figure I would be paying for the gas and depreciation if I was running the errands myself, so I’d prefer she just use my car and gas.
I had my virtual assistant from India doing odd jobs for me whenever I needed something, he couldn’t speak English over the phone very well but as long as we kept his tasks online he was a rockstar! It’s hard to get started with a VA and harder to learn how to manage yours but once you are past the learning phase, they become invaluable.
I also forgot to mention…I went from 60 hour work weeks to about 30 with the help of my VA. I don’t make as much because I pay someone else to do half my work…but I’m a lot happier.
A personal assistant would be a mit more heavier on the cost side but might be useful for running local errands. But virtual assistants are indispensable when it comes to quality work, delivered within deadlines at a comparatively lower price an hour. An interesting article on virtual assistants at http://outsorcerer.com/blog/?p=21