<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Windows on a Mac</title> <atom:link href="http://www.productivity501.com/windows-on-a-mac/1865/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.productivity501.com/windows-on-a-mac/1865/</link> <description>Pieces of the productivity puzzle.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:44:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Brett Legree</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/windows-on-a-mac/1865/comment-page-1/#comment-90363</link> <dc:creator>Brett Legree</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:54:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/?p=1865#comment-90363</guid> <description>I second that - AVG has worked well for me for many years.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second that &#8211; AVG has worked well for me for many years.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Shead</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/windows-on-a-mac/1865/comment-page-1/#comment-90194</link> <dc:creator>Mark Shead</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:13:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/?p=1865#comment-90194</guid> <description>@Stuart - Try AVG.  I&#039;ve had pretty good luck with it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stuart &#8211; Try AVG.  I&#8217;ve had pretty good luck with it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stuart</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/windows-on-a-mac/1865/comment-page-1/#comment-90187</link> <dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:08:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/?p=1865#comment-90187</guid> <description>I&#039;m trying out Fusion now. I love it so far. I just hate trying to find free antivirus stuff for Windows now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying out Fusion now. I love it so far. I just hate trying to find free antivirus stuff for Windows now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Shead</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/windows-on-a-mac/1865/comment-page-1/#comment-90118</link> <dc:creator>Mark Shead</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:10:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/?p=1865#comment-90118</guid> <description>@Brett - Thanks for the information.  I&#039;ll have to try out the new version of Fusion.  I have CrossOver Mac, but I haven&#039;t tried it for anything other than a game or two.
Is the 2.0 release pretty stable in your experience?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brett &#8211; Thanks for the information.  I&#8217;ll have to try out the new version of Fusion.  I have CrossOver Mac, but I haven&#8217;t tried it for anything other than a game or two.</p><p>Is the 2.0 release pretty stable in your experience?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brett Legree</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/windows-on-a-mac/1865/comment-page-1/#comment-90122</link> <dc:creator>Brett Legree</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:33:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/?p=1865#comment-90122</guid> <description>@Mark,
My pleasure!  I used to use CrossOver on Linux to run Office which worked well.  The new Fusion supports DirectX 9 and runs quite a few games at an acceptable level (at least the ones I want to play!), so I&#039;ve not done much with CrossOver Mac myself.
So far Fusion 2.0 has been good.  I did encounter one odd thing with one of the new features - it allows a kind of &quot;folder sharing&quot; that can map some of your Mac&#039;s folders (Documents, Music, Pictures) to the guest machine&#039;s equivalents - but Beta 2 seemed to do something to the host folders, and I had to manually change them back to allow write access.
(I think Repair Permissions under the Disk Utility would have done the same thing.)
I might try it anyway with the RC and see if they fixed that, since I know I can change it back myself.
Generally it has been stable and good enough for me to run Office 2007 without issues.  The Unity mode is also really nice.
Give it a shot if you like, as it is free to use for now.  They also include a 1-year McAfee antivirus licence with it.
-Brett</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark,</p><p>My pleasure!  I used to use CrossOver on Linux to run Office which worked well.  The new Fusion supports DirectX 9 and runs quite a few games at an acceptable level (at least the ones I want to play!), so I&#8217;ve not done much with CrossOver Mac myself.</p><p>So far Fusion 2.0 has been good.  I did encounter one odd thing with one of the new features &#8211; it allows a kind of &#8220;folder sharing&#8221; that can map some of your Mac&#8217;s folders (Documents, Music, Pictures) to the guest machine&#8217;s equivalents &#8211; but Beta 2 seemed to do something to the host folders, and I had to manually change them back to allow write access.</p><p>(I think Repair Permissions under the Disk Utility would have done the same thing.)</p><p>I might try it anyway with the RC and see if they fixed that, since I know I can change it back myself.</p><p>Generally it has been stable and good enough for me to run Office 2007 without issues.  The Unity mode is also really nice.</p><p>Give it a shot if you like, as it is free to use for now.  They also include a 1-year McAfee antivirus licence with it.</p><p>-Brett</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brett Legree</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/windows-on-a-mac/1865/comment-page-1/#comment-90116</link> <dc:creator>Brett Legree</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/?p=1865#comment-90116</guid> <description>I use Fusion myself (and the first release candidate of Fusion 2.0 just came out today), but you could also use VirtualBox at http://www.virtualbox.org/ or CrossOver Mac at http://www.codeweavers.com/products/cxmac/ - VirtualBox works similarly to Fusion and Parallels, whereas CrossOver Mac is based on WINE and you don&#039;t need a Windows licence to run your programs.
I agree with you, XP is more responsive than Vista.
-Brett</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Fusion myself (and the first release candidate of Fusion 2.0 just came out today), but you could also use VirtualBox at <a
href="http://www.virtualbox.org/">http://www.virtualbox.org/</a> or CrossOver Mac at <a
href="http://www.codeweavers.com/products/cxmac/">http://www.codeweavers.com/products/cxmac/</a> &#8211; VirtualBox works similarly to Fusion and Parallels, whereas CrossOver Mac is based on WINE and you don&#8217;t need a Windows licence to run your programs.</p><p>I agree with you, XP is more responsive than Vista.</p><p>-Brett</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
