<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Tuesdays Tip: Time for Reading</title> <atom:link href="http://www.productivity501.com/tuesdays-tip-time-for-reading/185/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.productivity501.com/tuesdays-tip-time-for-reading/185/</link> <description>Pieces of the productivity puzzle.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mark Shead</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/tuesdays-tip-time-for-reading/185/comment-page-1/#comment-20420</link> <dc:creator>Mark Shead</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:07:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/tuesdays-tip-time-for-reading/185/#comment-20420</guid> <description>@Andre - Reading is just like anything else, you have to make the time.  For many people, cutting out television is a great way to get some extra time reading.  Another option is to listen to audio books during your commute.  I find I do best if I schedule time for reading and stick with it. For a lot of people reading for a while in bed is a good option as it helps them wind down and relax.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andre &#8211; Reading is just like anything else, you have to make the time.  For many people, cutting out television is a great way to get some extra time reading.  Another option is to listen to audio books during your commute.  I find I do best if I schedule time for reading and stick with it. For a lot of people reading for a while in bed is a good option as it helps them wind down and relax.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JT</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/tuesdays-tip-time-for-reading/185/comment-page-1/#comment-20128</link> <dc:creator>JT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/tuesdays-tip-time-for-reading/185/#comment-20128</guid> <description>Great Post.  It is always better to have more input than output--that way your ideas are sharper, more focused, and original.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post.  It is always better to have more input than output&#8211;that way your ideas are sharper, more focused, and original.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andre Chmielewski</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/tuesdays-tip-time-for-reading/185/comment-page-1/#comment-19992</link> <dc:creator>Andre Chmielewski</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:50:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/tuesdays-tip-time-for-reading/185/#comment-19992</guid> <description>Sounds pretty copasetic, but the question for me remains: how do I find the time to get reading done?
It&#039;s hard to find the time or energy in a busy schedule to read. Any ideas?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds pretty copasetic, but the question for me remains: how do I find the time to get reading done?</p><p>It&#8217;s hard to find the time or energy in a busy schedule to read. Any ideas?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
