<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most for Your Minute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.productivity501.com/the-most-for-your-minute-2/114/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.productivity501.com/the-most-for-your-minute-2/114/</link>
	<description>Pieces of the productivity puzzle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:02:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Artur Paikin</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/the-most-for-your-minute-2/114/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Artur Paikin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 20:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://x.xeric.net/productivity501/?p=114#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Nice one, thanks!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/the-most-for-your-minute-2/114/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://x.xeric.net/productivity501/?p=114#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Roger--I&#039;m glad you liked the post.  The first time I ran into this simulation they gave you a bunch of extra information about the individuals.  One had young children at home, one was a drug addict, etc.  The point was to distract you from the fact that there was a win-win solution for everyone and focus on who had to lose (in this case die).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger&#8211;I&#8217;m glad you liked the post.  The first time I ran into this simulation they gave you a bunch of extra information about the individuals.  One had young children at home, one was a drug addict, etc.  The point was to distract you from the fact that there was a win-win solution for everyone and focus on who had to lose (in this case die).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/the-most-for-your-minute-2/114/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://x.xeric.net/productivity501/?p=114#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the advice on how to order your tasks to be more productive.  When I read the simulation, I had though of a solution that hinged more on morality/ethics than on actual logic.  

I did send the old man up the ladder last, not because then he wouldn&#039;t drown, but because he had the least to lose if he had drowned given that he&#039;s lived his life already.  In that sense, another tip may be to remember to prioritize your tasks based on importance as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the advice on how to order your tasks to be more productive.  When I read the simulation, I had though of a solution that hinged more on morality/ethics than on actual logic.  </p>
<p>I did send the old man up the ladder last, not because then he wouldn&#8217;t drown, but because he had the least to lose if he had drowned given that he&#8217;s lived his life already.  In that sense, another tip may be to remember to prioritize your tasks based on importance as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
