<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resolution Matters for a Paperless Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/</link>
	<description>Pieces of the productivity puzzle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shead</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/comment-page-1/#comment-64153</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/#comment-64153</guid>
		<description>@Glenn - Both of those screen shots appear the same size on the screen.  The one that looks bigger just has many more pixels because the resolution of that monitor is so much higher.  With the smaller example, it is nearly impossible to read--not because of the size, but because there just isn&#039;t enough detail to make out the letters.

With a higher resolution screen you can see the small details much more clearly.  The two images show what a big difference there is between the resolution of the two monitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Glenn &#8211; Both of those screen shots appear the same size on the screen.  The one that looks bigger just has many more pixels because the resolution of that monitor is so much higher.  With the smaller example, it is nearly impossible to read&#8211;not because of the size, but because there just isn&#8217;t enough detail to make out the letters.</p>
<p>With a higher resolution screen you can see the small details much more clearly.  The two images show what a big difference there is between the resolution of the two monitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Biggs</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/comment-page-1/#comment-64151</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Biggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/#comment-64151</guid>
		<description>Mark,

What is the lesson about resolution? 

I don&#039;t understand your statement &quot;Now I know looking at this post, the second example is much bigger, but keep in mind they are actually the same size on the two screens.&quot;

I know more pixels produce better quality images but what&#039;s the best way to make the text readable? What&#039;s the best combination: more pixels, widescreen or normal, enlarging text, etc.?

Thanks,
Glenn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>What is the lesson about resolution? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand your statement &#8220;Now I know looking at this post, the second example is much bigger, but keep in mind they are actually the same size on the two screens.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know more pixels produce better quality images but what&#8217;s the best way to make the text readable? What&#8217;s the best combination: more pixels, widescreen or normal, enlarging text, etc.?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Glenn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shead</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/comment-page-1/#comment-13418</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/#comment-13418</guid>
		<description>@Arjun - The ScanSnap comes with Acrobat which has OCR.  However, I&#039;ve found that DevonThink&#039;s OCR is far superior so I prefer to use it instead.  DevonThink uses IrisScan if I remember correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Arjun &#8211; The ScanSnap comes with Acrobat which has OCR.  However, I&#8217;ve found that DevonThink&#8217;s OCR is far superior so I prefer to use it instead.  DevonThink uses IrisScan if I remember correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjun Muralidharan</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/comment-page-1/#comment-13417</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun Muralidharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/#comment-13417</guid>
		<description>Yes Yep doesn&#039;t have OCR capabilites, but as you noted, I rarely need OCR and if I do, I use the corresponding app.

I was wondering about the ScanSnap, does it have inbuilt OCR processing or do I still need another application for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Yep doesn&#8217;t have OCR capabilites, but as you noted, I rarely need OCR and if I do, I use the corresponding app.</p>
<p>I was wondering about the ScanSnap, does it have inbuilt OCR processing or do I still need another application for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shead</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/comment-page-1/#comment-13414</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/#comment-13414</guid>
		<description>@Arjun - From looking at it, it looks like Yep will scan documents and let you search documents, but you can search a document that you scanned.  I don&#039;t think Yep has any OCR capability.  Is this what you&#039;ve found?  Of course it probably doesn&#039;t matter if you are scanning handwritten notes.  

Much of DevonThink&#039;s power comes from its ability to classify documents automatically.  This only works if it can read the text.  So for example, if you scan in your bank statement, DevonThink will do OCR and figure out that it is similar to other bank statements and suggest that you put it in the bank statement folder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Arjun &#8211; From looking at it, it looks like Yep will scan documents and let you search documents, but you can search a document that you scanned.  I don&#8217;t think Yep has any OCR capability.  Is this what you&#8217;ve found?  Of course it probably doesn&#8217;t matter if you are scanning handwritten notes.  </p>
<p>Much of DevonThink&#8217;s power comes from its ability to classify documents automatically.  This only works if it can read the text.  So for example, if you scan in your bank statement, DevonThink will do OCR and figure out that it is similar to other bank statements and suggest that you put it in the bank statement folder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjun Muralidharan</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/comment-page-1/#comment-13410</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun Muralidharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/resolution-matters-for-a-paperless-office/401/#comment-13410</guid>
		<description>Mark, it&#039;s good to have a monitor that can actually serve as a reading device. I don&#039;t print out the slides my professors hand out at Uni, I just study while they run on my 20 inch iMac screen alongside. Saves paper, trees and storage - and time waiting beside the printer.

You asked whether Yep searches inside PDFs, and I can answer: Yes, it does. You can use tags, but Yep also scans the document (if it&#039;s a PDF with the text information embedded).

I only recently came across the Fujitsu ScanSnap and was wowed by the speed this thing has. I always thought my Flatbed was the be-all end-all of things.

But the price is too steep for me at this moment, and I&#039;m hoping to be able to buy one in February. I scan all my college notes and discard the paper for recycling. Again, saves space, and I&#039;ll never lose a classes notes again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, it&#8217;s good to have a monitor that can actually serve as a reading device. I don&#8217;t print out the slides my professors hand out at Uni, I just study while they run on my 20 inch iMac screen alongside. Saves paper, trees and storage &#8211; and time waiting beside the printer.</p>
<p>You asked whether Yep searches inside PDFs, and I can answer: Yes, it does. You can use tags, but Yep also scans the document (if it&#8217;s a PDF with the text information embedded).</p>
<p>I only recently came across the Fujitsu ScanSnap and was wowed by the speed this thing has. I always thought my Flatbed was the be-all end-all of things.</p>
<p>But the price is too steep for me at this moment, and I&#8217;m hoping to be able to buy one in February. I scan all my college notes and discard the paper for recycling. Again, saves space, and I&#8217;ll never lose a classes notes again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
