<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Papers &#8211; Paperless Office for Academics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/</link>
	<description>Pieces of the productivity puzzle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/comment-page-1/#comment-23045</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/#comment-23045</guid>
		<description>Another new one that could be worth a look is a.nnotate for web based 
pdf annotation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another new one that could be worth a look is a.nnotate for web based<br />
pdf annotation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/comment-page-1/#comment-13546</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/#comment-13546</guid>
		<description>@Mark,

Zotero is a very promising program and is under rapid development. I tried it out a while ago, but opted for Papers because of it&#039;s ability to automatically download and save papers in a folder structure (i.e. year, journal, author, etc.). A citation plugin for Word and Open Office was recently added to Zotero as well.

Papers does not currently have annotation capabilities, but the developers have said it is planned for a future release. I currently use Skim to do my PDF annotation. The only issue I have encountered with Skim is that you have to export the PDF if you want a PC-using colleague to be able to see your annotations. Leopard supposedly has some improved PDF annotation features, but I am still on Tiger for the time being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark,</p>
<p>Zotero is a very promising program and is under rapid development. I tried it out a while ago, but opted for Papers because of it&#8217;s ability to automatically download and save papers in a folder structure (i.e. year, journal, author, etc.). A citation plugin for Word and Open Office was recently added to Zotero as well.</p>
<p>Papers does not currently have annotation capabilities, but the developers have said it is planned for a future release. I currently use Skim to do my PDF annotation. The only issue I have encountered with Skim is that you have to export the PDF if you want a PC-using colleague to be able to see your annotations. Leopard supposedly has some improved PDF annotation features, but I am still on Tiger for the time being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shead</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/comment-page-1/#comment-13529</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/#comment-13529</guid>
		<description>@Roberto &amp; Kelle - Thanks for mentioning Zotero and BibDesk.  I&#039;ll have to check those out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roberto &#038; Kelle &#8211; Thanks for mentioning Zotero and BibDesk.  I&#8217;ll have to check those out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelle Cruz</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/comment-page-1/#comment-13526</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelle Cruz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/#comment-13526</guid>
		<description>LaTex users should definitely consider BibDesk as an alternative to Papers. While Papers is better for browsing articles, notetaking, and finding related articles, BibDesk has some browsing features and is ideal for maintaining an awesome .bib file. Also, BibDesk is free while Papers is not.
http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaTex users should definitely consider BibDesk as an alternative to Papers. While Papers is better for browsing articles, notetaking, and finding related articles, BibDesk has some browsing features and is ideal for maintaining an awesome .bib file. Also, BibDesk is free while Papers is not.<br />
<a href="http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/comment-page-1/#comment-13514</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/papers-paperless-office-for-academics/386/#comment-13514</guid>
		<description>I agree with you: at a first glance papers just seems impressive. However I can&#039;t use it because I&#039;m a linux fan. So I suggest having a look at *zotero* (www.zotero.org): an open source firefox extension with similar features.
I&#039;m quite happy with zotero. It can import bibliographies from various websites (among the others google scholar, jstor, science direct..), add notes, tag pdf, export to bibtex etc.
The only thing I miss is the possibility to annotate pdf natively. Every time I have to open either &quot;foxit reader&quot; or &quot;acrobat reader&quot; but that&#039;s only a minor fault. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you: at a first glance papers just seems impressive. However I can&#8217;t use it because I&#8217;m a linux fan. So I suggest having a look at *zotero* (www.zotero.org): an open source firefox extension with similar features.<br />
I&#8217;m quite happy with zotero. It can import bibliographies from various websites (among the others google scholar, jstor, science direct..), add notes, tag pdf, export to bibtex etc.<br />
The only thing I miss is the possibility to annotate pdf natively. Every time I have to open either &#8220;foxit reader&#8221; or &#8220;acrobat reader&#8221; but that&#8217;s only a minor fault. <img src='http://www.productivity501.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
