<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Scanning Your Signature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.productivity501.com/on-scanning-your-signature/377/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.productivity501.com/on-scanning-your-signature/377/</link>
	<description>Pieces of the productivity puzzle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:02:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/on-scanning-your-signature/377/comment-page-1/#comment-13902</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/on-scanning-your-signature/377/#comment-13902</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a tip I came across year ago for protecting your bank accounts, traveller&#039;s cheques, etc. In the same way that you might have a common password for all your low-security/risk websites/accounts and a different one for you2 or 3 main high-security/risk websites/accounts, you can do the same with your signature.

Have one signature for daily use.

Have another, that is different, for signing when money is involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a tip I came across year ago for protecting your bank accounts, traveller&#8217;s cheques, etc. In the same way that you might have a common password for all your low-security/risk websites/accounts and a different one for you2 or 3 main high-security/risk websites/accounts, you can do the same with your signature.</p>
<p>Have one signature for daily use.</p>
<p>Have another, that is different, for signing when money is involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shead</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/on-scanning-your-signature/377/comment-page-1/#comment-11056</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/on-scanning-your-signature/377/#comment-11056</guid>
		<description>@Christine - I reread that after seeing your link.  It was pretty amazing what he could get by with as a signature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Christine &#8211; I reread that after seeing your link.  It was pretty amazing what he could get by with as a signature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.productivity501.com/on-scanning-your-signature/377/comment-page-1/#comment-10738</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/on-scanning-your-signature/377/#comment-10738</guid>
		<description>Regarding how closely most people verify signatures, I&#039;m sure I won&#039;t be the only person to think of the Credit Card Prank detailed on Zug a couple years ago. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zug.com/pranks/credit/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding how closely most people verify signatures, I&#8217;m sure I won&#8217;t be the only person to think of the Credit Card Prank detailed on Zug a couple years ago. <a href="http://www.zug.com/pranks/credit/" rel="nofollow">Link</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
