Most people have heard the expression, “There is no free lunch.” While this may be true in some situations, it isn’t always true in the realm of application software. Desktop publishing is one area where there are not a whole lot of alternatives. Microsoft hold the biggest share of the market, by far. However, IBM has come up with a free product called Symphony, which includes capabilities similar to a Microsoft Office Suite. Although the two programs are similar, they are, by no means, mirror images of each other.
Though the Microsoft Office Suite has just undergone a major update, some find the new layout a bit more confusing than they did the old. The word processor on Symphony shares more attributes with the 1997-2003 version of Word than the 2007 revision. For some, this may make things easier to find and use. For example, creating tables with Symphony is a very similar process to that in Word, although perhaps a bit simpler. The main difference is the developer’s use of icons for easy location of features. Instead of going to a “tools” tab and into a long line of drop-down menus, IBM simply has placed a single icon for user convenience.
The attribute that most users will find attractive about Lotus Symphony is that it is free. While it does take some time to download, the product runs smoothly and efficiently enough to be considered an effective productivity tool by most, I would think. Though Symphony is free, IBM does require registry of the product. In addition, the download process isn’t quite as streamlined as I expected, but it gets the job done. One thing that a prospective downloader might watch for is the check box marks on the agreement page. The site doesn’t prevent the download from taking place if a check box is accidentally not marked. Therefore, the user can go through most of the installation process only to get a “missing file” error message, which then triggers the installation process to undo everything it has accomplished up to that point. Once all of the boxes are checked and the agreements marked, the program installs completely without any problems.
Symphony has many of the same capabilities and attributes of its well-known competitors. One thing that I really liked about Lotus that I’ll reiterate is that the developers used more icons for common processes instead of burying them in odd places under a drop-down menu. With some desktop publishing programs I have used, half the battle is won if user can simply find where the tool is located. The developers behind Lotus seem to have taken this in mind when designing the user interface for their programs. Also, Symphony is available for users running Linux, Windows XP or Vista, and also Mac OSX. Lotus’ versatility is one time saver for those using computers with diverse operating systems.
The drawbacks of Lotus are few, as far as I have seen. It runs smoothly, has a pleasing layout and seems to be a worthy competitor for the business world. However, one thing that a user might want to take into account is that the software, especially the presentation side of things, seems to be geared more toward business presentations, which is wonderful if this is what it is going to be used for. For those looking for a more creative than businesslike version of presentation software, this might not be the right product; however, it is perfectly suited to the needs of a businessperson with its simple integration for charts and other graphics.
All in all, the Symphony lineup of Document, Spreadsheet and Presentation creation software seem to fit the audience they were intended for very well. Each aspect of the program functions much like the Microsoft versions of each comparable program. While there is some free software available now that is not coducive to a productive lifestyle, Lotus Symphony seems to be quite the opposite.