<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Large Monitor = More Productivity</title> <atom:link href="http://www.productivity501.com/large-monitor-more-productivity/65/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.productivity501.com/large-monitor-more-productivity/65/</link> <description>Pieces of the productivity puzzle.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: marc</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/large-monitor-more-productivity/65/comment-page-1/#comment-154173</link> <dc:creator>marc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:58:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://x.xeric.net/productivity501/?p=65#comment-154173</guid> <description>I also use two 19&quot; screens at work, although I would suggest going to something like two 21&quot;. Screen creep maybe?
I think something critical to take into consideration regarding screen size and productivity -- as it is with almost anything -- is to properly evaluate the appropriateness, specifications, and evaluate against thoroughly established requirements.
Too often these kinds of  studies don&#039;t make an appropriate enough link between the specific purpose and use cases for the particular configurations being promoted as increasing productivity. As I can imagine it would be appropriate in many cases at Apple, I can see how a really large single screen may be appropriate for something like a graphic/computer artist that might need to see the &quot;whole picture&quot; but only need to focus on the single subject they are working on. But even within that specific user group, there are surely graphic/computer artists who work on different subject matters and might need several screens open in order to move components back and forth.
When I used to work with contracts or documents a lot more than I do now, I used to have my screen turned to portrait mode in order to see more of the relevant text at an appropriate size rather than having dead-space columns to the left and right of the open document. This configuration made me slightly more productive than the &quot;traditional&quot; screen configuration because it allowed me to have a better overview and find things more easily.
The point I am making is that there cannot be a magic number, i.e., 30&quot; screen or X number of monitors, the particular workflow and subject matter has to be taken into proper evaluation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also use two 19&#8243; screens at work, although I would suggest going to something like two 21&#8243;. Screen creep maybe?</p><p>I think something critical to take into consideration regarding screen size and productivity &#8212; as it is with almost anything &#8212; is to properly evaluate the appropriateness, specifications, and evaluate against thoroughly established requirements.</p><p>Too often these kinds of  studies don&#8217;t make an appropriate enough link between the specific purpose and use cases for the particular configurations being promoted as increasing productivity. As I can imagine it would be appropriate in many cases at Apple, I can see how a really large single screen may be appropriate for something like a graphic/computer artist that might need to see the &#8220;whole picture&#8221; but only need to focus on the single subject they are working on. But even within that specific user group, there are surely graphic/computer artists who work on different subject matters and might need several screens open in order to move components back and forth.</p><p>When I used to work with contracts or documents a lot more than I do now, I used to have my screen turned to portrait mode in order to see more of the relevant text at an appropriate size rather than having dead-space columns to the left and right of the open document. This configuration made me slightly more productive than the &#8220;traditional&#8221; screen configuration because it allowed me to have a better overview and find things more easily.</p><p>The point I am making is that there cannot be a magic number, i.e., 30&#8243; screen or X number of monitors, the particular workflow and subject matter has to be taken into proper evaluation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jelle de Haas</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/large-monitor-more-productivity/65/comment-page-1/#comment-117774</link> <dc:creator>Jelle de Haas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:14:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://x.xeric.net/productivity501/?p=65#comment-117774</guid> <description>At the office I work on two 19&quot; monitors, ideal for a lot of open windows and alternating focus on different projects and aspects.
At home my laptop runs 1200x800, which is ideal for a quick update and for doing quick tasks. It also keeps me from doing too much work from home which infringes on my home/work balance.
In the same vein I only use my work laptop at home on battery power. This servers as a reminder that I&#039;ve spent two hours doing work-related stuff from home, and that&#039;s more than enough!
(Oh the link to Apple&#039;s website isn&#039;t working)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the office I work on two 19&#8243; monitors, ideal for a lot of open windows and alternating focus on different projects and aspects.</p><p>At home my laptop runs 1200&#215;800, which is ideal for a quick update and for doing quick tasks. It also keeps me from doing too much work from home which infringes on my home/work balance.</p><p>In the same vein I only use my work laptop at home on battery power. This servers as a reminder that I&#8217;ve spent two hours doing work-related stuff from home, and that&#8217;s more than enough!</p><p>(Oh the link to Apple&#8217;s website isn&#8217;t working)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Shead</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/large-monitor-more-productivity/65/comment-page-1/#comment-71215</link> <dc:creator>Mark Shead</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:19:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://x.xeric.net/productivity501/?p=65#comment-71215</guid> <description>@Marc - Good point.  I haven&#039;t ever really thought about my video card on my MacBook Pro, but I did upgrade my Linux desktop the other day so some of the effects would work better on my 30 inch monitor.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Marc &#8211; Good point.  I haven&#8217;t ever really thought about my video card on my MacBook Pro, but I did upgrade my Linux desktop the other day so some of the effects would work better on my 30 inch monitor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marc</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/large-monitor-more-productivity/65/comment-page-1/#comment-71214</link> <dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:16:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://x.xeric.net/productivity501/?p=65#comment-71214</guid> <description>Something else to consider; you need a video card that can display sufficiently large resolution so that you don&#039;t just end up with a larger version of what you have on your smaller display.
When most people get a large monitor they are trying to increase the real estate, not blowing up the displayed image to clownish proportions (which would only be a benefit if trying to view the display from a farther distance than before).
Along the same line of thought; when looking for a display, make sure that it can support high resolution video cards, because if it doesn&#039;t, the image can potentially appear distorted or you will be stuck with a geriatric version of the display you had before.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something else to consider; you need a video card that can display sufficiently large resolution so that you don&#8217;t just end up with a larger version of what you have on your smaller display.</p><p>When most people get a large monitor they are trying to increase the real estate, not blowing up the displayed image to clownish proportions (which would only be a benefit if trying to view the display from a farther distance than before).</p><p>Along the same line of thought; when looking for a display, make sure that it can support high resolution video cards, because if it doesn&#8217;t, the image can potentially appear distorted or you will be stuck with a geriatric version of the display you had before.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
