Comments on: Doing Less

By: Rajesh

Rajesh — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:40:16 +0000

I like what Covey said on this – Most people create a to do list for the day and then try to see which tasks will get priority – Covey looks at the other way and asks that we not “prioritise our schedules but schedule our priorities”.

The key here is of course – understanding our priorities!

Bill’s comment is interesting as the person he refers to reminds me of a professor who taught me operations management – his punch line when handing out assignments – “Be intelligently lazy”.

Not that laziness is ever a virtue, but sometimes we can be lazy in our thinking while sometimes lazy in our actions and in an attempt to be conscientious, we don’t think.

By: Helen

Helen — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:11:19 +0000

Time management and focus, are some of the most important things related to productivity and being productive. It’s true, that if you do the most important things first…the rest just comes in hand. You feel relieved and it sort of comes more in handy to think and to act.

By: Mark Shead

Mark Shead — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:37:39 +0000

Here is another way to put what I’m trying to say: I want to spend my time on the $500 per hour tasks not the $7.50 per hour tasks. That way I can achieve the same or much greater level of value with much less time commitment. My “extra” time can go into self development that will increase the value of the other work I choose to do.

By: Christine Simiriglia

Christine Simiriglia — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:36:42 +0000

I’d change the name of the post. Its less about doing less and more about accomplishing more. Its about time-management and outcomes. Doers rarely do less, they do other things (preferred tasks or leisure activities) with their time when they can get their required tasks done more efficiently. Its about spending our time with stones and not sand: http://www.organize-more-stress-less.com/home/2009/11/6/do-you-spend-your-time-with-stones-or-sand.html

By: Ed

Ed — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:25:46 +0000

What are some specific suggestions that you have that facilitate or focus someone to accomplish more? You talk about imagination as part of the equation. Perhaps training employees in how to be “super organized” frees one’s mind to improve imaginative thought? Curious to see what you have to say. Thanks. Great post!
Ed

By: Bill James-Wallace

Bill James-Wallace — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:18:48 +0000

True, ‘lazy’ was his term. Though I’m not sure you could call them highly efficient. I think there are a lot of instances where we should be asking “what would happen …?”

By: Mark Shead

Mark Shead — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:33:33 +0000

Maybe instead of “lazy” we should call them “highly efficient”. There are a lot of things in business (and government) that could be simplified if people would simply ask “what would happen if we just stopped doing this?”

By: Bill James-Wallace

Bill James-Wallace — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:30:40 +0000

Hi, I know this is a late comment but I thought it was interesting.

A few years ago I worked with a guy who said that every company needs lazy people. They need them because when there are complex tasks to be done, the lazy person finds the path of least resistance. This path often opens up opportunities for streamlining that would never be apparent to the conscientious worker – who always wants to do things correctly. So, we can actually do less if we look at some things (not all) from a laziness perspective. Note: I do not advocate laziness per se!