<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: AT&amp;T DSL Only Option</title> <atom:link href="http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/</link> <description>Pieces of the productivity puzzle.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:44:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Internet Access : Productivity501</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/comment-page-1/#comment-122377</link> <dc:creator>Internet Access : Productivity501</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:01:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/#comment-122377</guid> <description>[...] primary Internet connection in my home office is DSL through AT&amp;T. I have the DSL only option (also known as dry dsl or naked DSL) which means I don&#8217;t have to pay for a regular [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] primary Internet connection in my home office is DSL through AT&amp;T. I have the DSL only option (also known as dry dsl or naked DSL) which means I don&#8217;t have to pay for a regular [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Shead</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/comment-page-1/#comment-120943</link> <dc:creator>Mark Shead</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:29:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/#comment-120943</guid> <description>@minnefornia - I like the idea of calling it pure DSL a bit better than naked DSL.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@minnefornia &#8211; I like the idea of calling it pure DSL a bit better than naked DSL.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: minnefornian</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/comment-page-1/#comment-120939</link> <dc:creator>minnefornian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:01:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/#comment-120939</guid> <description>If the naked line is only 30-34, that would be a decent savings in the Eau Claire, WI area. We have a barebone landline w/6Mb DSL and pay 55 dollars. To go 3Mb would shave off another 4 dollars. Wow.
I&#039;m all for &quot;pure&quot; DSL as Centurytel calls it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the naked line is only 30-34, that would be a decent savings in the Eau Claire, WI area. We have a barebone landline w/6Mb DSL and pay 55 dollars. To go 3Mb would shave off another 4 dollars. Wow.</p><p>I&#8217;m all for &#8220;pure&#8221; DSL as Centurytel calls it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Williams</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/comment-page-1/#comment-103015</link> <dc:creator>Mark Williams</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:48:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/#comment-103015</guid> <description>This was a regulatory requirement of their acquisition of Bell South. Commonly referred to as Naked DSL.
However, it saves maybe $3-5 bucks a month over having a no-frills local access only phone line.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a regulatory requirement of their acquisition of Bell South. Commonly referred to as Naked DSL.</p><p>However, it saves maybe $3-5 bucks a month over having a no-frills local access only phone line.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Shead</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/comment-page-1/#comment-8491</link> <dc:creator>Mark Shead</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:51:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/#comment-8491</guid> <description>Hm. Maybe it isn&#039;t available in every location.  I went to www.att.com &gt; Internet Tab &gt; Check availability &gt; Check by Address  and then selected the internet only option.
You also might try calling them.  I think you get a free modem if you do it online though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. Maybe it isn&#8217;t available in every location.  I went to <a
href="http://www.att.com">http://www.att.com</a> > Internet Tab > Check availability > Check by Address  and then selected the internet only option.</p><p>You also might try calling them.  I think you get a free modem if you do it online though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/comment-page-1/#comment-8485</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:25:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.productivity501.com/att-dsl-only-option/355/#comment-8485</guid> <description>Where did you find the DSL only option?  I looked on the website and couldn&#039;t find it.  Thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you find the DSL only option?  I looked on the website and couldn&#8217;t find it.  Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
